Pierson v. Watters

Per Curiam. In this record there is no bill of exceptions signed and sealed by the judge who tried the cause, and no suggestion of a diminution of the record having been made, the presumption is that the original bill of exceptions was not signed. Miller v. Jenkins, 44 Ill. 443. In such case we cannot consider what is copied into the the record as a bill of exceptions to be any part of the record. Reeves v. Reeves, 54 Ill. 332. . The judgment will be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.