Loading…

Congiardo v. Bordenaro — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Congiardo v. Bordenaro

106 Ill. App. 2d 374 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 26, 1969

Full text

Peter Congiardo v. Tony Bordenaro, Sr., and Tony Bordenaro, Jr.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE DRUCKER. Not to be published in full.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Drucker
Judges: Drucker
Cluster ID: 7104515

Citations

106 Ill. App. 2d 374
1969 Ill. App. LEXIS 1751
245 N.E.2d 884

Cited by

District of Columbia v. Bethel
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1990
Johnson v. Chicago Transit Authority
Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 22, 1973

Parentheticals

misstatement of testimony of witness by counsel in argument to jury did not require reversal where attorney was merely stating his recollection of testimony and it was for jury to determine what had been testified to
District of Columbia v. Bethel

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service