Loading…

State v. Stucky — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Stucky

2 Blackf. 289 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1829

Full text

State v. Stucky, in Error

AN indictment, for retailing spirituous liquors to divers persons without licence, is bad. It should either contain the names of the persons to whom the sale was made, or state their names to be unknown. 1 Chitt. C. L. 211.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 7122325

Citations

2 Blackf. 289
1829 Ind. LEXIS 42

Cited by

Walters v. State
Indiana Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1910
State v. Hogreiver
Indiana Supreme Court · May 23, 1899
Beebe v. State
Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1855
State v. Irvin
Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1840
Butler v. State
Indiana Supreme Court · May 28, 1840

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service