Bish v. Bradford

Worden, J. This was a proceeding by Bish against Bradford and the Cincinnati <& Chicago Railroad Co., under the statute regulating proceedings supplementary to execution. The complaint alleges a recovery by the plaintiff of a judgment against the railroad company; the issuing of an execution thereon, and the return of no property, &c.; that the defendant, Bradford, is indebted to the company in the sum of fifty dollars, and the interest thereon, on a subscription made by him to the capital stock of the Cincinnati, New Castle <& Michigan Railroad Go., which company consolidated with the Cincinnati, Cambridge dc Chicago Short Line Railroad Co., thereby constituting the Cincinnati c& Chicago Railroad Co., which last named company afterward, consolidated with the Cincinnati, Logansport té Chicago Railway Co., thereby constituting the company first above named. A copy of the subscription is set out. The railroad company was defaulted. Bradford answered in six paragraphs. A demurrer was sustained as to all except the fifth, to which a demurrer was overruled, and the plaintiff excepted. Replication, trial, verdict and judgment for the defendant. [492] The ruling on the demurrer to the fifth paragraph of the answer presents the first question in the record, and the decision of that disposes of the whole case. That paragraph is as follows: “ 5. Said defendant further answers and says, that it is true that this defendant subscribed to the capital stock of the Cincinnati, New Castle. (& Michigan Railroad Co., lor one share, of fifty dollars, but the defendant avers that the same was obtained through the fraud, deceit and misrepresentation of said company, through her agents, as hereinafter mentioned. This defendant avers that at the time and before the subscription was made, and for the purpose of inducing this defendant to make the same, the agent of said company falsely, fraudulently and deceitfully represented to him, that said company had sufficient means to build their contemplated road from New Castle, Henry county, Indiana, to Marion, and from thence to the town of Wabash, and so north to Grand river, in the State of Michigan; that said company did not need a dollar from the citizens along the line of said railroad; that said road would be completed to Marion, and the cars be running, within eighteen months; that -within that time all the real estate on or near the line of said road, would be greatly augmented in value; that the said company, having all the means necessary for completing said road, did not need to call upon the people on or near the line of said road for subscriptions to her capital stock, for the purpose of assisting ni building the road, because they had sufficient means- foi that purpose, but that in view of the great amount of capp'd which the company would invest and expend on the line v.f the road, they desired that the citizens along and near th-' line of the road should subscribe a sufficient amount to h»* stock to show that they were friendly to the enterprise, an-t to satisfy the company of the good will of the people, that th '«ie might be an assurance that the vast capital thus invested would be secure. This defendant also says that he was the c’-.wr of a farm near the town of Marion, at the time of makKs* Mud subscription, and believed that it would be proper im- .isun to make said subscription, on account of said inducein -. [493] and representations and promises, and believing the same to be true, and that said agents were truthful and reliable, they being the agents of the company for soliciting subscriptions to her capital stock. This defendant says that he knew that if said representations were true, that said road would be very certain to be built in a short time and would be a great advantage to him, by augmenting the value of his farm, and furnishing a home market for his surplus produce; which representations defendant avers were the sole inducement for said subscription. This defendant avers, that believing and relying upon said several representations of said agents, he was induced by the same to make said subscription. Defendant avers that said representations were false and fraudulent, and coming from men who were noted as preachers of the Gospel, (as defendant alleges said agents were,) they were well calculated to deceive and mislead the defendant; which he avers they did, and that said agents made the same for that purpose, knowing the same to be false. This defendant avers the truth to be, that said Cincinnati, Newcastle <& Michigan Railroad Co. had not the means even to procure, clear and grub the track of said road. That said road is not completed, but, on the contrary, all idea of prosecuting said work, and completing the same, has long since been abandoned by said Cincinnati <& Chicago Railroad Co., without defendant’s consent.” We are of opinion that this paragraph is insufficient; that the facts charged do not release the defendant from liability on his subscription. Hie false representations charged to have been made may be divided into two classes: First. Those relating to the means of the company, and her ability to complete the road. Second. Those that relate to the time within which the road would be completed, and the effect such completion would have on the property of the country. The first class are insufficient, because they are but mere expressions of opinion upon an existing fact, and its connection with a future event. It will be observed that no particular amount of means were represented to have been possessed by the company. Tile substance of the statements [494] in this respect was, that the company had sufficient means to build the road, without obtaining subscriptions along the line of the road. This could have been nothing but matter of opinion. How much it would cost to build the road, or whether the means would hold out, depended upon events which, probably, neither the corporation nor the defendant could foresee. In Hardy v. Merriweather, 14 Ind. 203, it was held, that representations that the company had stock enough to complete the road, and would do it in two years, were too vague, and manifestly nothing more than expressions of opinion. That case is decisive of the present, in this particular. A. Steele, H. D. Thompson and J. Brownlee, for the appellant. Isaac Van Devanter, J. F. McDowell and H. S. Kelley, for the appellee. The second class of representation^ relate to the future. They relate to no existing fact, and are so clearly matters of opinion and speculation, that nothing further need be said upon them. The entire consideration of the defendant’s subscription was the share of stock for which he subscribed. The New Albany & Salem Railroad Co. v. Fields, 10 Ind. 187. Now he can not say, that because the road has not been built, and therefore that his property has not been enhanced in value, an incidental benefit that he expected to obtain, the consideration of his subscription has failed. The fact that the construction of the road has been abandoned, furnishes no defense. Creditors have a right to pursue stockholders of a corporation, even after its corporate existence has ceased. Hardy v. Merriweather, supra. The demurrer should have been sustained. Per Guriam. — The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.