Clyde James Freeman v. United States Parole Commission

78 F.3d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Clyde James FREEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-55415. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996.* Decided March 5, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. [1] MEMORANDUM** [2] Federal prisoner Clyde James Freeman appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the Parole Commission's decision to continue his release date to the expiration of his prison sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, Grady v. Crabtree, 958 F.2d 874, 874 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam), and affirm for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, adopted in full by the district court in its February 21, 1995 order. [3] AFFIRMED. Footnotes [-s] * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4 [-s-s] ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3