Flippins v. West Terre Haute Lumber Co.

McMahan, J. The only question which appellant attempted to present which has any merit, is that the court erred in its conclusions of law. [208] .Instead of excepting to the conclusions of law and assigning as error in this court, that the court erred in its conclusions of law, appellant seeks to present the question through her motion for a new trial. This can not be done. Midland R. Co. v. Dickason (1892), 130 Ind. 164, 29 N. E. 775. Judgment affirmed.