Commonwealth ex rel. Ohio County v. C, O. & S. W. R. R.

' Extended Opinion by Cbtei? Justice Hobson. On the former appeal of this case it was pointed out that the case was governed by the opinion in I. C. R. R. Co. v. Commonwealth, 128 Ky., 268; that the Illinois’ Central Railroad Company was not liable for the tax of 1896; that the C. O. & S. W. R. R. Co. was alone responsible for this; but that the Illinois Central Bailroad Company was liable for the tax of 1897. The mandate was in these words: “Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a judgr inent against the Illinois Central Bailroad Company as above indicated. A judgment will be entered against the Chesapeake, Ohio and Southwestern Railway Company for the tax of the year 1896.” (C. O. & S. W. R. R. Co. v. Commonwealth, 129 Ky., 320.) On a petition for rehearing the opinion was modified in so far as it directed a judgment to be entered for the taxes for the reason that the levies were insufficient to warrant a judgment, "but" in' other respects the opinion was unchanged; it being pointed out how the defects in the levies might be remedied. (129 Ky., 320-322.) . The opinion .on that appeal is the law of .the case. In concluding the opinion delivered on this appeal we said: “Judgment reversed, and cause remanded that judgment may be entered in conformity herewith.” (Com. v. C. O. & S. W. R. R. Co., 141 Ky., 638.) [473] The defects in the levies having been corrected as set ont in the former opinion, we referred to the judgment held proper in the former opinion, that is, a personal judgment against the C. O. & S. W. R. R. Co. for the tax of 1896, with interest, and a personal judgment against the I. C. E. E. Co. for the tax of 1897 with interest from the time the tax was payable. The mandate is extended as above indicated.