Swann v. Rabb

By Division A, composed of Chief Justice PROVOSTY and Justices OVERTON and LECHE. PROVOSTY, C. J. This suit is based on a state of facts exactly similar to that in the case of Duke v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth (No. 24784; La.) 91 South. 440,1 this day decided, and involves the same legal propositions. Eor the reasons there stated, judgment affirmed. Rehearing refused by Division B, composed of Justices O’NIELL, LAND, and BAKER. Footnotes [1] Ante, p. 1023.