Loading…

State v. Smith — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Smith

70 N.J. 213 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1976

Full text

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. JOSEPH SMITH, MICHAEL RYTELEWSKI, HERBERT DOLAN AND JAMES W. HYRES

Opinions in this case

Opinion — Per curiam
Majority
Dissent — Pashman
Dissent — Conford

Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Conford, Pashman
Cluster ID: 7378980

Citations

70 N.J. 213
1976 N.J. LEXIS 193
358 A.2d 782

Cited by

Hai Nguyen v. Attorney General New Jersey
Third Circuit · Aug 10, 2016
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 10, 2010

Parentheticals

5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service