Full text
WILFRED TANTUM v. CHARLES D. BINZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Botter, reported at 186 N.J.Super. 296, 302 (1981).
For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O’HERN —6.
For affirmance —None.