Loading…

Jones v. Mitchell — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Jones v. Mitchell

1984 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1109 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 1984

Full text

BEN JONES v. DWIGHT MITCHELL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Marzulli, reported at 194 N.J.Super. 387 (Law Div.1984).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 7399776

Citations

1984 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1109
194 N.J. Super. 337
476 A.2d 1249

Cited by

In re Contest of November 8, 2011 General Election of Office of New Jersey General Assembly, Fourth Legislative District
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Jan 5, 2012
Wright v. Rumble
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Mar 29, 1984

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service