Full text
Bruce E. WALLIS, et ux. v. JUSTICE OAKS II, LTD.

Loading…
Opinion
112 L. Ed. 2d 398 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 5, 1990
N.D. Georgia · Mar 4, 2014
M.D. Georgia · Mar 18, 2011
D. Delaware · Aug 27, 2010
S.D. Texas · Apr 11, 2008
S.D. Florida · Jan 25, 2008
M.D. Florida · Apr 2, 2007
M.D. Florida · Mar 30, 2007
M.D. Florida · Nov 16, 2006
N.D. Alabama · Sep 25, 2006
Parentheticals
acknowledging Florida’s adoption of the “transactional” test set forth in Restatement (2d) of Judgments § 24 (1982)
Puff 'N Stuff of Winter Park, Inc. v. Federal Trust Bank, F.S.B.
creditor lost its right to object to another creditors claim once the bankruptcy court confirmed the debtor’s plan
order confirming a plan of reorganization is entitled to preclusive effect on all claims or issues which were raised or could have been raised in the confirmation proceedings
Bowen v. United States, Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (In Re Bowen)
an objection that challenges the classification of a claim must be made before confirmation of the chapter 13 plan or it will be deemed allowed by the confirmation order
although addressing the issue as one of finality, circuit court refused to apply res judicata where bankruptcy court, in entering order approving settlement, “consider[ed] many factors other than the merits” of the underlying dispute
L.J. Hooker International Florida, Inc. v. Gelina (In Re Hooker Investments, Inc.)
bankruptcy court’s order confirming a reorganization plan entitled to res judicata effect
North Alabama Anesthesiology Group, P.C. v. Zickler (In Re North Alabama Anesthesiology Group, P.C.)