Loading…

Lurie v. Halderman — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Lurie v. Halderman

516 U.S. 1011 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 4, 1995

Full text

Abraham M. LURIE v. Richard A. HALDERMAN, Jr.

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 7471714

Citations

516 U.S. 1011
133 L. Ed. 2d 493
116 S. Ct. 568
64 U.S.L.W. 3397
1995 U.S. LEXIS 8355

Cited by

Moro v. State of Oregon
Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2015
Frett v. Howard University
District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2014
Stewart v. Gates
District of Columbia · May 16, 2011
Brown v. Children's National Medical Center
District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2011
United States v. Municipio De Vega Alta

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

D. Puerto Rico · May 15, 2007

Campos-Martinez v. Superintendence of the Capitol of Commonwealth

D. Puerto Rico · Apr 19, 2007

Bunda v. Potter

N.D. Iowa · May 2, 2005

MacIntosh v. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n International

District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2004

Healy v. Henderson

D. Massachusetts · Aug 7, 2003

Sherman v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court · Aug 1, 2002

Mukaida v. Hawaii

D. Hawaii · Jul 12, 2001

Hilands v. Department of Revenue, 4512 (or.tax 5-2-2001)

Oregon Tax Court · May 2, 2001

Parentheticals

holding that an individual defendant cannot be held personally liable under Title VII and a claim against an individual defendant “essentially merges” with the claim against the agency
Stewart v. Gates
holding that Title VII does not impose individual liability on supervisory employees
Emmons v. Rose's Stores, Inc.
holding that, “while a supervisory employee may be joined as a party defendant in a Title VII action, that employee must be viewed as being sued in his capacity as the agent of the employer, who is alone liable for a violation of Title VII.”
MacIntosh v. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n International
Title VII does not impose individual liability on supervisory employees
Hall v. State Farm Insurance
individual supervisors not personally liable under Title VII
Chatman v. Gentle Dental Center of Waltham