Loading…

Pence v. Pence — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Pence v. Pence

98 So. 2d 744 · Supreme Court of Florida · Dec 4, 1957

Full text

Frederick G. PENCE v. Nancy PENCE

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Roberts

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. HOBSON, ROBERTS and DREW, JJ., dissent.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Connell, Drew, Hobson, Roberts, Terrell, Thomas, Thornal
Cluster ID: 7488855

Citations

98 So. 2d 744

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service