Loading…

Hamill v. Miodonski — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Hamill v. Miodonski

182 So. 2d 464 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 25, 1966

Full text

James F. HAMILL v. Edward MIODONSKI, Mathew Miodonski, and the Keyes Company, a Florida corporation

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Kaminsky v. Wye, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 44; Diaz v. Keyes Company, Fla.App.1962, 143 So. 2d 554.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Barkdull, Carroll, Parson
Cluster ID: 7494437

Citations

182 So. 2d 464

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service