Kitchens v. Doe

1966 Fla. LEXIS 2934 · Supreme Court of Florida · Nov 9, 1966

Full text

Nellie KITCHENS v. John DOE

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Roberts

PER CURIAM. This appeal reflected apparent jurisdiction and the case was heard on oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further considering the matter, we have determined the appeal does not lie because we lack jurisdiction to consider it pursuant to Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution F.S.A. Therefore it is ordered this appeal be dismissed. THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., dissents with opinion. O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., dissent.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal
Cluster ID: 7498517

Citations

1966 Fla. LEXIS 2934
194 So. 2d 258
54 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 11,555

Cited by

Radio Broadcast Technicians Local Union No. 1264 v. Jemcon Broadcasting Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 21, 1967

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Kitchens v. Doe — freecase.ai