Ray v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad

PER CURIAM. This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Gentry (Fla.1950), 46 So.2d 485; Holl v. Talcott (Fla.1966), 191 So.2d 40. WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD and RAWLS, JJ., concur.