Piland v. O. K. Inc.

PER CURIAM. This cause has been orally argued before the court, and the briefs and record on appeal have been read and given full consideration. It is our view that this case, involving the interpretation of an option to purchase agreement contained in a lease, was correctly decided by the trial judge, [817] and the judgment appealed should therefore be affirmed on the authority of Martin v. Albee, 93 Fla. 941, 113 So. 415 (1927). Affirmed. WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.