Loading…

Hicks v. Johnson City Law Enf. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Hicks v. Johnson City Law Enf.

134 F.3d 368 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 11, 1997

Full text

Hicks v. Johnson City Law Enf.

134 F.3d 368 Hicks v. Johnson City Law Enf.* NO. 97-10634 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Dec 11, 1997 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. ,No.497CV265Y [1] Dismissed. Footnotes [-s] * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 750741

Citations

134 F.3d 368
1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 38751
1997 WL 811680

Cited by

Mills v. Pivot Occupational Health
D. Delaware · Feb 15, 2022
Harris v. Hase
N.D. Texas · May 28, 2020

Parentheticals

“If the blood sample was used to obtain the criminal conviction, as the district court correctly reasoned, the constitutionality of the seizure of the sample would implicate the validity of Hick’s conviction”
Mills v. Pivot Occupational Health

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service