holding that even if we assumed that the predecessor to La. R.S. 22:868 voided a group ERISA plan's choice of law provision, the claimant had not raised a fact issue regarding whether the policy was issued and delivered in Massachusetts
Antonio Jimenez, III v. Sun Life Assurance Company
declining to apply the predecessor to La. R.S. 22:868 when the claimant had not raised an issue of fact over the policy being issued and delivered in Massachusetts
Gray v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
affirming dismissal with prejudice where the plaintiff failed to allege any discriminatory acts occurring within the forty-five-day period preceding his initial contact with an Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor as required by 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1)
LIGGINS v. G.A. & F.C. WAGMAN, INC.
