Full text
OXFORD CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, a foreign corporation v. Martha ADLER
Opinions in this case
- Majority
- Concurrence in part — Carroll
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion made pursuant to Rule 1.540(b), RCP 31 F.S.A., to vacate a judgment. The issue here is whether the trial court erred in holding that appellant’s motion did not show excusable neglect. We hold that the motion and accompanying affidavit were insufficient to show excusable neglect. See Austin Burke, Inc. v. Vigilant Insurance Co., Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 600.
Affirmed.