Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Moody

DAUKSCH, Judge. Appellant suffered a Summary Judgment and has appealed. Because we find there were factual issues raised in the answer precluding the entry of the Summary Judgment we must reverse. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Kash ‘N’ Karry Wholesale Supermarkets, Inc. v. Garcia, 221 So.2d 786 (Fla.3d DCA 1969); Egan v. Washington General Insurance Corporation, 240 So.2d 875 (Fla.4th DCA 1970). REVERSED. CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.