Newman v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. On consideration of the briefs, record and argument of counsel, we find no reversible error. Yost v. State, 243 So.2d 469 (Fla.3d DCA 1971); De la Cova v. State, 355 So.2d 1227 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Williams v. State, 353 So.2d 588 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Mack v. State, 346 So.2d 1229 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Jefferson v. State, 298 So.2d 465 (Fla.3d DCA 1974). Accordingly, the conviction is affirmed.