Full text
Thomas Albert PANNIER v. The STATE of Florida
PER CURIAM. Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. Castle v. State, 305 So.2d 794 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), affirmed 330 So.2d 10 (Fla.1976); Wildie v. State, 326 So.2d 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
