Alimenta (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Pender Peanut Co.

1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17808 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 17, 1980

Full text

ALIMENTA (U.S.A.), INC. v. PENDER PEANUT CO.

PER CURIAM. Sua sponte, this Court dismisses the appeal on the ground that it was untimely filed. The order appealed from is an order denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss for [8] improper venue. Such an order is interlocutory, and a motion to reconsider its entry is not authorized by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.530(a). Thus, the filing and pendency of a motion for reconsideration does not toll the time for taking an appeal. “M ” Enterprises, Inc. v. Baumgartner, 362 So.2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Joanos, Liles, Wentworth, Woodie
Cluster ID: 7577348

Citations

1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17808
389 So. 2d 7

Cited by

City of Melbourne v. Floyd
District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 19, 1982

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service