Opinion

Ibis Construction Co. v. Sinclair

1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21539 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 3, 1981

Full text

IBIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Richard SINCLAIR and Barbara Sinclair

Opinions in this case

Majority
Concurrence in part — Hubbart

PER CURIAM. We conclude that the finding that the appellant was guilty of civil contempt by violating agreed court orders is completely supported by the evidence, see, Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 88 So.2d 891 (Fla.1956); and that the assessment of a compensatory fine which included the appellees’ attorney’s fees was justified by the circumstances and the applicable law. South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, supra; National Exterminators, Inc. v. Truly Nolen, Inc., 86 So.2d 816 (Fla.1956); Gregory v. Mucho K, Inc., 438 F.Supp. 1117 (S.D.Fla.1977), rev’d on other grounds, 578 F.2d 1156 (5th Cir. 1978). Affirmed.

S.D. Florida · Oct 31, 1994

Lamb v. Fowler

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 6, 1991

Pollock v. T & M Investments, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 28, 1984

Parentheticals

concluding the finding that the appellant was guilty of civil contempt was supported by the evidence, and the assessment of a compensatory fine which included the appellee's attorney's fees was justified by the circumstances and the applicable law
Daniel Kaplan v. Kenneth B. Schurr
where the finding that the appellant was guilty of civil contempt was supported by the evidence, the assessment of a compensatory fine that included the appellee's attorney's fees was justified by the circumstances and the applicable law
Lamb v. Fowler