Harris v. Soules

PER CURIAM. The trial court properly found that appellant failed to adduce competent evidence of a boundary dispute or uncertainty by the parties or their predecessors which was resolved by establishing a boundary through agreement or acquiescence. See King v. Carden, 237 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). The order granting judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict is AFFIRMED. ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.