Full text
Vidonio MERCADO v. The STATE of Florida
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Mullins v. State, 366 So.2d 1162 (Fla.1978) (Alderman, J., concurring), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 883, 100 S.Ct. 173, 62 L.Ed.2d 113 (1979); Wright v. State, 418 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Neely v. State, 402 So.2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Ramos, 378 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
We have examined the issue presented by the cross-appeal and find the cross-appeal to be without merit.
