Schutter v. State

PER CURIAM. Schutter filed with this Court his Motion For Post-Conviction Relief Pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850 Based Upon Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel. As authorized by Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c) we treat this motion as an application for habeas corpus. Futch v. State, 420 So.2d 905 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Upon review and full consideration we are of the opinion that Schutter has failed to establish any grounds for relief. Denied. LETTS, C.J., and ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.