Tupica v. State

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals his conviction of attempted trafficking in cocaine. We find no merit in any of the arguments presented to us and affirm. See Silvestri v. State, 332 So.2d 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), and Nichols v. State, 248 So.2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). AFFIRMED. ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.