Johnson v. State

PER CURIAM. The order appealed is affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s ability to present the issues raised in a proper Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion. See Hurst v. State, 379 So.2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Carrin v. State, 459 So.2d 430 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1984). ERVIN, C.J., and SMITH and NIM-MONS, JJ., concur.