Caceres v. Milton

PER CURIAM. Finding that the issue presented in this case is subject to the controlling authority of Russell v. A & L Development, Inc., 273 So.2d 439, 440 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 279 So.2d 308 (Fla.1973), which holds that a party may not “attempt to receive a second satisfaction for the same wrong against a different party,” we affirm the Final Summary Judgment. See Weber v. Tam-Bay Realty, Inc., 490 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Affirmed.