Rhone v. Rhone

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Pratt v. Pratt, 502 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hoyt v. Hoyt, 457 So.2d 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). In this case, we find no difference between joint tenants by the entireties and tenants in common. We find no merit in appellant’s third point. LEHAN, A.C.J., SANDERLIN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.