Opinion

Voigt v. Voigt

12 Fla. L. Weekly 1021 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 14, 1987

Full text

Theresa VOIGT v. Alexander VOIGT

PER CURIAM. We agree with the appellant that the trial court erred in holding her in contempt for refusing to return certain personalty belonging to the husband without conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine her present ability to comply with the court's order. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985). The order of contempt is reversed, and this cause is remanded for the trial court with directions to conduct the requisite evi-dentiary hearing. Reversed and remanded with directions.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Ferguson, Jorgenson, Pearson
Cluster ID: 7625371

Citations

12 Fla. L. Weekly 1021
1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7769
505 So. 2d 626

Cited by

Welsh v. Martinez
M.D. Florida · Jul 17, 2023
Leo v. Leo
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 8, 2012

Parentheticals

reversing order finding wife in contempt for refusing to return husband’s belongings where trial court failed to conduct evidentiary hearing on wife’s present ability to comply
Leo v. Leo
trial court erred in holding wife in contempt for refusing to return certain items belonging to husband without conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine wife’s present ability to comply with the court’s order
Welsh v. Martinez