Opinion

Moore v. Moore

1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10431 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 23, 1987

Full text

Marie G. MOORE, etc. v. Danny K. MOORE

PER CURIAM. We affirm this appeal involving a question of child support because no error or abuse of discretion is demonstrated in the record before us. The record, however, does not contain a transcript of the hearing resulting in the order appealed. Appellant states that the proceedings were not reported, but, despite ample opportunity to do so, appellant chose not to submit a statement pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3). AFFIRMED. MILLS, ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Ervin, Mills, Nimmons
Cluster ID: 7628577

Citations

1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10431
12 Fla. L. Weekly 2291
512 So. 2d 1141

Cited by

EZRA WASHINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 25, 2023
Lafaille v. Lafaille
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 17, 2003
Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. Heinold v. Schwass
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 6, 1993
Estate of Paulk v. Lindamood
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 26, 1988

Parentheticals

affirming child support determination because record did not ‘contain a transcript of the hearing resulting in the order appealed’ nor statement of evidence or proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)
EZRA WASHINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE