Loading…

Howell v. Falls — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Howell v. Falls

1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12239 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 7, 1987

Full text

Kent HOWELL v. Kathleen A. FALLS

Opinions in this case

Majority
Concurrence — Glickston
Dissent — Anstead

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. LETTS, J., concurs. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion. ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Anstead, Glickstein, Glickston, Letts
Cluster ID: 7629044

Citations

1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12239
12 Fla. L. Weekly 2381
513 So. 2d 1096

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service