Full text
Timothy Michael WOOD v. STATE of Florida
Opinions in this case
- Majority
- Concurrence — Schoonover
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Henriquez v. State, 513 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Because appellant’s issue concerning court costs has recently been decided adversely to him,
[731] Barker v. State, 518 So.2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), wherein we certified a question of great public importance to our supreme court, we certify the same question in this case.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.
SCHOONOVER, J., specially concurs.