Loading…

Lynch v. Cullen — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Lynch v. Cullen

13 Fla. L. Weekly 479 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 16, 1988

Full text

James T. LYNCH v. Anne T. CULLEN

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Pearson

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART, J., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Hubbart, Pearson, Schwartz
Cluster ID: 7632064

Citations

13 Fla. L. Weekly 479
1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 632
521 So. 2d 209
1988 WL 10435

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service