Shaw v. State

PER CURIAM. The order summarily denying appellant’s 3.850 motion for post conviction relief on grounds that it is legally insufficient is affirmed without prejudice. Appellant may file an amended motion before the trial court for review setting forth any sufficient reasons why he did not include his arguments in the previous motion. See Tanner v. State, 502 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). AFFIRMED. SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.