Edwards v. State

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. We believe the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction. In addition, on the evidence presented, we believe a reasonable jury could have found that appellant’s alleged theory of the case did not present a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See Berriel v. State, 524 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We also find no reversible error in the other issues raised on appeal, ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.