Yanke v. State

PER CURIAM. We find no merit in defendant’s contentions on appeal except for his contention that his sentencing guidelines score was erroneously calculated. We agree with that contention. See Yanke v. State, 540 So.2d 848 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 547 So.2d 1212 (1989). Defendant’s convictions are affirmed, the sentence is reversed, and the cause is remanded for resentencing. CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.