Cusmina v. State

GUNTHER, Judge. The trial court’s order revoking Appellant’s probation is affirmed. However, the case is remanded for the trial court to strike those findings that probation conditions 9 and 10 were violated. See § 948.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1987); Chatman v. State, 365 So.2d 789 (Fla.4th DCA 1978); Glaze v. State, 547 So.2d 313 (Fla.4th DCA 1989). DELL and GARRETT, JJ., concur.