Larson-Jackson v. Neal

PER CURIAM. This cause is per curiam affirmed. See § 48.193(l)(h), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1988). This amended version of the statute was in effect at the time of the trial judge’s ruling. Apparently, the parties did not advise the trial judge of this amendment, which renders his decision correct albeit for the wrong reason. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). AFFIRMED. [568] LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., . concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.