Stromn v. State

PER CURIAM. REVERSED. We find the record of the question and answer exchange between the appellant and the trial court insufficient to constitute a factual predicate for the trial court’s adjudication of direct criminal contempt. See Silver v. State, 117 So.2d 509 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960). ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.