Karten v. Kent

PER CURIAM. Appellant Alan Karten, defendant below, appeals a final judgment against him on a claim for conversion. We conclude that the law of conversion was correctly applied, Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co., 450 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); that Paul Kent was not an indispensable party, W.R. Cooper, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 512 So.2d 324 (Pla. 3d DCA 1987); and that no reversible error has been shown with respect to the evidentiary rulings. Affirmed.