Gordon v. Fortune Savings Bank

1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3306 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 16, 1990

Full text

Joel P. GORDON v. FORTUNE SAVINGS BANK

PER CURIAM. We reverse the summary final judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff, Fortune Savings Bank, and against Defendant, Joel P. Gordon, because there exists a genuine issue of material fact which precludes entry of summary judgment as a matter of law. That issue is whether or not Fortune Savings Bank was a holder in due course as concerns the promissory note in question that was assigned to it. Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust, 405 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith. WALDEN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Garrett, Gunther, Walden
Cluster ID: 7649358

Citations

1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3306
561 So. 2d 30
1990 WL 64150

Cited by

Keane v. Andrews
District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 16, 1990

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service