Loading…

Sturdivant v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Sturdivant v. State

1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 307 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · May 11, 1990

Full text

Tom Boaz Sturdivant v. State.

Opinions in this case

Majority — McMillan
Concurrence in part — Bowen

McMillan, judge. AFFIRMED. TAYLOR, P.J., and TYSON and PATTERSON, JJ., concur. BOWEN, J., dissents in part, concurs in part.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: McMillan
Judges: McMillan, Taylor, Tyson, Patterson, Bowen
Cluster ID: 7652724

Citations

1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 307
568 So. 2d 415
1990 WL 90510

Cited by

Sturdivant v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 5, 1993

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service