PER CURIAM.
We find that the judgment and conviction should be affirmed in all respects; however, we find error in the trial court’s sentencing of the defendant as a habitual offender on count II without providing specific reasons therefor.
[703] We reverse the sentence as to count II only and we remand for resentencing on this count. The trial judge should state with specificity the reasons for sentencing any defendant as a habitual offender. Williams v. State, 532 So.2d 1341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).
GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
LETTS, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Loading…