Forney v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review Forney v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th D.C.A.1990), which certified the same question recently answered by the Court in Barfield v. State, 594 So.2d 259 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash the [306] opinion below and remand for reconsideration in light of Barfield. It is so ordered. SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.