Opinion

H.L.L. v. State

1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2205 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 28, 1992

Full text

H.L.L. v. STATE of Florida

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority — Campbell

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge. Appellant, a juvenile, was convicted of possession of cocaine and grand theft auto. He was adjudicated delinquent and committed to the Department of HRS. He was placed on community control upon release. Appellant challenges his conviction and resulting sentence. We find no merit in his arguments concerning his conviction. We do, however, find that the court erred when it sentenced him. We remand for resentencing in compliance with section 39.09(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1989), which requires that specific findings be made by the trial court to support its decision to adjudicate and commit appellant to HRS. No findings were made by the trial court here. We further remand for entry of separate sentences for appellant’s two offenses. A general sentence for separate offenses, such as he received, is prohibited. C.P. v. State, 543 So.2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Affirmed, but remanded for resentenc-ing. PARKER, J., and McDONALD, RANDALL G., Associate Judge, concur.

G.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 29, 2001

V.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 23, 2001

S.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 12, 1997

M.T.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 10, 1996

J.E.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 19, 1996

E.Y. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 20, 1996

M.U. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 23, 1996

S.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 29, 1995

T.A.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 5, 1994

Parentheticals

remanding for resentencing where court failed to make statutorily required findings supporting adjudication and commitment
J.E.W. v. State